Media Evaluation

 Fake research paper accept.doc              Link to our blog -

Welcome to Ms. Berger's Media Evaluation Homework site.  Check here for your homework assignments as well as in your planner.  If you have any questions about your assignment, please use the email Ms. Berger button on here, email me directly at or for the quickest response text me (before 10:00pm please) at 496-9737.     Thank you!

Media Evaluation

BLIZZARD BAG 3 - As we have just started reading or will begin reading The Information Diet, for your blizzard bag please bring in/share a substantial example of fake or unhealthy news and a quality example of factual news from a reputable news source. 

Blizzard Bag 2 for 1/17/2018
To help you prepare for midterms, let's review some information from Malcolm Gladwell's The Tipping Point.  Use the internet to define the following theories in a document you share at , on the classroom page, or on a paper and bring to school deposit in the "turn it in" box:
The Power of Context
 Broken Windows Theory
The Law of the Few
80/20 Principle
Rule of 150
Stickiness Factor
The Tipping Point

Classroom Code is nb2sdrj

1/11/18 - Midterms begin this Thursday - Blocks 1 & 2
Friday - Blocks 3 & 4
Monday - Blocks 5 & 6
Tuesday - Blocks 7 & 8

Review everything we have done this semester to prepare for your midterms.

12/12/17 We watched Consuming Kids. Please watch for discussion on Friday!

10/27/17 Make sure I have your Critique on Cool It and your Satirical essay revisions turned in. Grades close next Friday.  
You also should have read through chapter 5 in The Tipping Point.

10/11/17 - SATIRICAL ESSAYS ARE DUE!  Finish these up please, print and hand in ASAP. (The ones that I have received so far are fantastic!)

10/5/17 - We have read 3/4 of chapter 3. Students should be typing up the first draft of their satirical essays, due on Wed. (except block 3, we will spend a little time next class, but they should still be working on them!)

9/28/17 - Finish reading chapter 2 in The Tipping Point

Homework - Pay attention to satire you see, read and view in your daily lives.

BLIZZARD BAG 1  (updated 12/8/17)

NY Times acknowledges the obvious
From a post by’s editor James Taranto (original post date 6/17/13):
The New York Times reports on a new study with a blindingly obvious conclusion:
“News organizations are far more likely to present a supportive view of same-sex marriage than an antagonistic view, according to a content study by the Pew Research Center to be released on Monday [June 17].”
…No way! But actually there is news here, in that the leading [mouthpiece] of America’s left-liberal media has published an acknowledgment – if only a second-order one – of its own bias. Pew also looked at Twitter posts and found them “almost evenly divided between support and opposition for the measure – closely reflecting public opinion.”
“The study lends credence to conservative charges that the nation’s news media have championed the issue of same-sex marriage at the expense of objectivity,” writes the Times’s Brian Stelter. “Others have argued that news organizations are right not to overly emphasize opposition to what many see as a core civil rights issue.”
To sum up: The so-called mainstream media are overwhelmingly biased in favor of a position on which the public is evenly split. Within the media, there are two prevailing attitudes toward this bias: denial and defiance. Even opponents of same-sex marriage, by and large, don’t argue the media should be biased against it, but it would be nice if someone somewhere in the MSM would acknowledge both that the bias exists and that it is problematic.
1.  What type of bias does the media display in their reporting on same-sex marriage?

2.  In response to the NY Times' admission that the media is biased against traditional marriage, Mr. Taranto asserts:
“The mainstream media [MSM] are overwhelmingly biased in favor of a position on which the public is evenly split. Within the media, there are two prevailing attitudes toward this bias: denial and defiance. Even opponents of same-sex marriage, by and large, don't argue the media should be biased against it, but it would be nice if someone somewhere in the MSM would acknowledge both that the bias exists and that it is problematic.”
Do you agree with this assertion?  Explain your answer.

 Types of Media Bias
Bias by omission – leaving one side out of an article, or a series of articles over a period of time; ignoring facts that tend to disprove liberal or conservative claims, or that support liberal or conservative beliefs; bias by omission can occur either within a story, or over the long term as a particular news outlet reports one set of events, but not another.  To find instances of bias by omission, be aware of the conservative and liberal perspectives on current issues.  See if both the conservative and liberal perspectives are included in stories on a particular event or policy.

Bias by selection of sources – including more sources that support one view over another.  This bias can also be seen when a reporter uses such phrases as “experts believe”, “observers say,” or “most people believe”.  Experts in news stories are like expert witnesses in trials.  If you know whether the defense or the prosecution called a particular expert witness to the stand, you know which way the witness will testify.  And when a news story only presents one side, it is obviously the side the reporter supports.  (Journalists often go looking for quotes to fit their favorite argument into a news story.)  To find bias by use of experts or sources, stay alert to the affiliations and political perspective of those quoted as experts or authorities in news stories.  Not all stories will include experts, but in those that do, make sure about an equal number of conservatives and liberals are quoted.  If a story quotes non-experts, such as those portrayed as average citizens, check to be sure that about an equal number come from both sides of the issue in question.

Bias by story selection – a pattern of highlighting news stories that coincide with the agenda of either the Left or the Right, while ignoring stories that coincide with the opposing view; printing a story or study released by a liberal or conservative group but ignoring studies on the same or similar topics released by the opposing group.  To identify bias by story selection you’ll need to know the conservative and liberal sides of the issue.  See how much coverage conservative issues get compared to issues on the liberal agenda, or liberals compared to conservatives.  For example, if a liberal group puts out a study proving a liberal point, look at how much coverage it got compared to a conservative study issued a few days or weeks earlier, or vice versa.  If charges of impropriety are leveled at two politicians of approximately equal power, one liberal and one conservative, compare the amount of coverage given to each.

Bias by placement – Story placement is a measure of how important the editor considers the story.  Studies have shown that, in the case of the average newspaper reader and the average news story, most people read only the headline.  Bias by placement is where in the paper or in an article a story or event is printed; a pattern of placing news stories so as to downplay information supportive of either conservative views or liberal views.  To locate examples of bias by placement, observe where a newspaper places political stories.  Or whenever you read a story, see how far into the story each viewpoint first appears.  In a fair and balanced story, the reporter would quote or summarize the liberal and conservative view at about the same place in the story.  If not, you’ve found bias by placement.

Bias by labeling – Bias by labeling comes in two forms.  The first is the tagging of conservative politicians and groups with extreme labels while leaving liberal politicians and groups unlabeled or with more mild labels, or vice versa.  The second kind of bias by labeling occurs when a reporter not only fails to identify a liberal as a liberal or a conservative as a conservative, but describes the person or group with positive labels, such as “an expert” or “independent consumer group”.  In so doing, the reporter imparts an air of authority that the source does not deserve.  If the “expert” is properly called a “conservative” or a “liberal” the news consumer can take that ideological slant into account when evaluating the accuracy of an assertion.  When looking for bias by labeling, remember that not all labeling is biased or wrong.  Bias by labeling is present when the story labels the conservative but not the liberal, or the liberal but not the conservative; when the story uses more extreme sounding labels for the conservative than the liberal (“ultra-conservative”, “far right”, but just “liberal” instead of “far left” and “ultra-liberal”) or for the liberal than the conservative (“ultra-liberal”, “far left”, but just “conservative” instead of “far right” and ”ultra-conservative; and when the story misleadingly identifies a liberal or conservative official or group as an expert or independent watchdog organization.

Bias by spin – Bias by spin occurs when the story has only one interpretation of an event or policy, to the exclusion of the other; spin involves tone – it’s a reporter’s subjective comments about objective facts; makes one side’s ideological perspective look better than another.  To check if it’s spin, observe which interpretation of an event or policy a news story matches – the liberal or conservative.  Many news stories do not reflect a particular spin.  Others summarize the spin put on an event by both sides.  But if a story reflects one to the exclusion of the other, then you’ve found bias by spin.

The above information is excerpted and adapted from How to Identify Liberal Media Bias by Brent H. Baker, Vice President for Research and Publications at